| 2008 |
2007 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance contract liabilities |
22,173 |
23,189 |
|
| Participating investment contract liabilities |
11,619 |
14,874 |
|
33,792 |
38,063 |
At 31 December 2008 £29,967 million (2007: £35,603 million) of liabilities arising from insurance contracts and participating investment contracts had a contractual residual maturity of greater than one year.
Insurance contract liabilities, substantially all of which relate to business written in the United Kingdom, are comprised as follows:
|
2008 |
2007 |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gross |
Reinsurance* |
Net |
Gross |
Reinsurance* |
Net |
||||||
|
Life insurance (see (1)) |
21,518 |
(380) |
21,138 |
22,526 |
(340) |
22,186 |
|||||
|
Non-life insurance (see (2) below): |
|||||||||||
|
Unearned premiums |
472 |
– |
472 |
456 |
– |
456 |
|||||
|
Claims outstanding |
183 |
(5) |
178 |
207 |
(10) |
197 |
|||||
|
655 |
(5) |
650 |
663 |
(10) |
653 |
||||||
|
22,173 |
(385) |
21,788 |
23,189 |
(350) |
22,839 |
||||||
*Reinsurance balances receivable are reported within other assets (note 27).
The movement in life insurance contract liabilities over the year can be analysed as follows:
| Gross |
Reinsurance |
Net |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 January 2007 |
25,763 |
(425) |
25,338 |
||
| New business |
2,428 |
(18) |
2,410 |
||
| Changes in existing business |
(1,316) |
15 |
(1,301) |
||
| Disposal of businesses |
(4,349) |
88 |
(4,261) |
||
| At 31 December 2007 |
22,526 |
(340) |
22,186 |
||
| New business |
2,915 |
(32) |
2,883 |
||
| Changes in existing business |
(3,923) |
(8) |
(3,931) |
||
| At 31 December 2008 |
21,518 |
(380) |
21,138 |
The movement in liabilities arising from participating investment contracts may be analysed as follows:
£m |
|
At 1 January 2007 |
15,095 |
New business |
491 |
Changes in existing business |
(712) |
At 31 December 2007 |
14,874 |
New business |
208 |
Changes in existing business |
(3,463) |
At 31 December 2008 |
11,619 |
The process for determining the key assumptions for insurance contracts and participating investment contracts is set out below.
These policy liabilities can be split into With Profit Fund liabilities, accounted for using the FSA's realistic capital regime (realistic liabilities) and Non-Profit Fund liabilities, accounted for using a traditional prospective actuarial discounted cash flow methodology as described in the accounting policies.
The Group's With Profit Fund contains life insurance contracts and participating investment contracts. The calculation of With Profit Fund realistic liabilities uses best estimate assumptions for mortality, persistency rates and expenses. These are calculated in a similar manner to those used for the value of in-force business as discussed in note 24. The persistency rates used for the realistic valuation of the With Profit Fund liabilities make an allowance for potential changes in future experience as the guarantees and options within with-profits contracts become more valuable under adverse market conditions.
Other key assumptions are:
The realistic capital regime dictates that With Profit Fund liabilities are valued on a market-consistent basis. This is achieved by the use of a valuation model which values liabilities on a basis calibrated to tradable market option contracts and other observable market data. The With Profit Fund financial options and guarantees are valued using a stochastic simulation model where all assets are assumed to earn, on average, the risk-free yield and all cash flows are discounted using the risk-free yield. The risk-free yield is defined as the spot yield derived from the UK gilt yield curve.
The guaranteed annuity option take-up rates are set with regard to the Group's actual experience and make allowance for potential increases in take-up rates when the Guaranteed Annuity Options become more valuable to the policyholder.
The calibration of the stochastic simulation model uses implied volatilities of derivatives where possible, or historical volatility where it is not possible to observe meaningful prices. For example, as at 31 December 2008, the 10 year equity-implied at-the-money assumption was set at 34.6 per cent (31 December 2007: 25.5 per cent). The assumption for property volatility was 15 per cent (31 December 2007: 15 per cent), with swaption volatility of broadly 16 per cent (31 December 2007: broadly 11 per cent).
The mortality assumptions, including allowances for improvements in longevity for annuitants, are set with regard to the Group's actual experience where this is significant, and relevant industry data otherwise.
Lapse rates refer to the rate of policy termination and the rate at which policyholders stop paying regular premiums. These rates are based on a combination of historical experience and management's views on future experience taking into consideration potential changes in future experience that may result from guarantees and options becoming more valuable under adverse market conditions.
Generally, assumptions used to value Non-Profit Fund liabilities are prudent in nature and therefore contain a margin for adverse deviation. This margin for adverse deviation is based on management's judgement and reflects management's views on the inherent level of uncertainty. The key assumptions used in the measurement of Non-Profit Fund liabilities are:
The rates used are derived in accordance with the FSA Rules. These limit the rates of interest that can be used by reference to a number of factors including the redemption yields on fixed interest assets at the valuation date.
Margins for risk are allowed for in the assumed interest rates. These are derived from the limits in the FSA Rules, including reductions made to the available yields to allow for default risk based upon the credit rating of each stock.
The mortality and morbidity assumptions, including allowances for improvements in longevity for annuitants, are set with regard to the Group's actual experience where this provides a reliable basis, and relevant industry data otherwise, and include a margin for adverse deviation.
Lapse rates, set with regard to the Group's actual experience and with a margin for adverse deviation, are allowed for on some Non-Profit Fund contracts.
Allowance is made for future policy costs explicitly. Expenses are determined by reference to an internal analysis of current and expected future costs plus a margin for adverse deviation. Explicit allowance is made for future expense inflation.
During 2008, following a detailed review of the Group's current and expected experience, there has been a change in the key assumption in respect of lapse and paid-up rates. The impact of this change has been to decrease profit before tax by £143 million; this amount includes movements in liabilities and value of the in-force business in respect of insurance contracts and participating investment contracts.
Gross non-life insurance contract liabilities are analysed by line of business as follows:
|
2008 |
2007 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Credit protection |
293 |
274 |
|
|
Home |
359 |
385 |
|
|
Health |
3 |
4 |
|
|
655 |
663 |
For non-life insurance contracts, the methodology and assumptions used in relation to determining the bases of the earned premium and claims provisioning levels are derived for each individual underwritten product. Assumptions are intended to be neutral estimates of the most likely or expected outcome. There has been no significant change in the assumptions and methodologies used for setting reserves.
The reserving methodology and associated assumptions are set out below:
The unearned premium reserve is determined on a basis that reflects the length of time for which contracts have been in force and the projected incidence of risk over the term of each contract.
Claims outstanding comprise those claims that have been notified and those that have been incurred but not reported. Claims incurred but not reported are determined based on the historical emergence of claims and their average cost. The notified claims element represents the best estimate of the cost of claims reported using projections and estimates based on historical experience.
The movements in non-life insurance contract liabilities and reinsurance assets over the year have been as follows:
| Gross |
Reinsurance |
Net |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisions for unearned premiums |
|||||
| At 1 January 2007 |
438 |
– |
438 |
||
| Increase in the year |
632 |
(23) |
609 |
||
| Release in the year |
(614) |
23 |
(591) |
||
| At 31 December 2007 |
456 |
– |
456 |
||
| Increase in the year |
651 |
(23) |
628 |
||
| Release in the year |
(635) |
23 |
(612) |
||
| At 31 December 2008 |
472 |
– |
472 |
These provisions represent the liability for short-term insurance contracts for which the Group's obligations are not expired at the year end.
| Gross |
Reinsurance |
Net |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claims and loss adjustment expenses |
|||||
| Notified claims |
127 |
(4) |
123 |
||
| Incurred but not reported |
22 |
– | 22 |
||
| At 1 January 2007 |
149 |
(4) |
145 |
||
| Cash paid for claims settled in the year |
(275) |
– | (275) |
||
| Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|||||
| Arising from current year claims |
341 |
(9) |
332 |
||
| Arising from prior year claims |
(8) |
3 |
(5) |
||
| At 31 December 2007 |
207 |
(10) |
197 |
||
| Cash paid for claims settled in the year |
(245) |
7 |
(238) |
||
| Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|||||
| Arising from current year claims |
221 |
– |
221 |
||
| Arising from prior year claims |
– |
(2) |
(2) |
||
| At 31 December 2008 |
183 |
(5) |
178 |
||
| Notified claims |
160 |
(5) |
155 |
||
| Incurred but not reported |
23 |
– |
23 |
||
| At 31 December 2008 |
183 |
(5) |
178 |
||
| Notified claims |
188 |
(10) |
178 |
||
| Incurred but not reported |
19 |
– | 19 |
||
| At 31 December 2007 |
207 |
(10) |
197 |
The development of insurance liabilities provides a measure of the Group's ability to estimate the ultimate value of claims. The top half of the table below illustrates how the Group's estimate of total claims outstanding for each accident year has changed at successive year ends. The bottom half of the table reconciles the cumulative claims to the amount appearing in the balance sheet. The accident year basis is considered the most appropriate for the business written by the Group.
| 2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accident year |
||||||
| Estimate of ultimate claims costs: |
||||||
| At end of accident year |
227 |
211 |
208 |
317 |
205 |
1,168 |
| One year later |
209 |
207 |
206 |
311 |
||
| Two years later |
207 |
204 |
204 |
|||
| Three years later |
206 |
202 |
||||
| Four years later |
206 |
|||||
| Current estimate of cumulative claims |
206 |
202 |
204 |
311 |
205 |
1,128 |
| Cumulative payments to date |
(204) |
(197) |
(195) |
(265) |
(99) |
(960) |
| Liability recognised in the balance sheet |
2 |
5 |
9 |
46 |
106 |
168 |
| Liability in respect of earlier years |
8 |
|||||
| Total liability included in the balance sheet |
176 |
The liability of £176 million shown in the above table excludes £7 million of unallocated claims handling expenses.